> Are you serious? Would you base your research career on software that you don't trust? I wouldn't.
I guess you haven't seen the quality of academic code recently. The choices are basing your credibility on slow badly written code or fast badly written code.
Are you serious? Would you base your research career on software that you don't trust? I wouldn't.
Please, notice that 1% chance of full blowup means a not-null probability of nice-looking-but-actually-false results from time to time, and that's a risk no researcher is allowed to accept.