News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gym price discrimination by teye on Sunday February 14, 2010 @02:10AM (#1124263)
Recently experienced this with 24 Hour Fitness in SF.

Visited the location to sign up for the $199/yr my buddy paid. "That promotion [wasn't] currently running," but I got a call two days later saying that it was back on.

It's a shame to delay a customer like me who'll wait for the better price, but I bet you lose a lot of low-hanging fruit if you make the better price available permanently.

Without the system, eventually everyone gets the better price. And though slightly inconvenienced, I ended up joining for $199/yr.

Re:Gym price discrimination by angelbob on Sunday February 14, 2010 @09:25AM (#1124623)
24 Hour Fitness also has huge, huge disparities. I paid too much initially for a year in advance, but I now have a $50/yr membership forever, and my wife has $25/yr (!) because her timing was even better.

But the base rate is what, $150 to join and around $50/mo? I assume some people pay that, but it seems steep -- doubly so given what I'm paying :-)

Re:Gym price discrimination by rlpb on Sunday February 14, 2010 @04:11PM (#1125277)
Are you sure that's what actually happened? It sounds to me that they were trying to negotiate a higher price, realised that you weren't going to take it (when you didn't) and so you effectively negotiated them back down to $199/yr.
Re:Gym price discrimination by teye on Friday March 12, 2010 @09:26PM (#1188335)
That's what I thought too, but I saw the ordering system both times (before manipulation, immediately after boot-up) and the annual price was higher the first time and $199 the second time.