I don't understand this attitude, the Transmission team responded immediately to the problem. There's no indication that this was the result of some problem specific to the application or its developers.

Transmission was and remains my favorite torrent client on OS X, although I still like the torrent information presentation uTorrent had, and I still will run my old pre-adware 1.6.4 if I want more detail on a swarm.

Given that older versions still work, it seems exceptionally silly to delete an old version because of a site compromise.

Isn't it open source?

So clone the last release version you trusted, build that from source and be happy?

I don't even trust websites and emails, so not sure why you would trust a bittorrent client. I still use these tools, but with some some caution. Your level of caution is up to you. Other posters suggested things such as verifying checksum and virtual machines.

flying the day after 9/11 was the safest time, I really doubt this sort of thing will happen again to the same software

This would be true if they knew how it was compromised, they've been silent on that issue so far.

The current version could be being compromised this minute for all we know.

Not an official comment, but from other parts of the hacker news thread it sounds like one of the mirrors the main site redirects to was hacked, not the main site itself. The SHA sums on the main site where apparently unaltered. So it sounds like the only fault on the developers is trusting that mirror.

Same here, into the garbage it goes. What did you switch to by the way, Deluge? I switched TO Transmission because it was open source and supposed to be pure.

Do you trust the alternatives?