News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by nanexllc on Saturday March 05, 2016 @07:17PM (#11231803)
In 2010, internalizers ABSOLUTELY, WITHOUT QUESTION, priced retail investor orders with SIP prices (the feed that got way behind). What the NYSE was doing:

ABSOLUTELY. POSITIVELY. Impacted retail investors and mutual funds.

Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by consz on Saturday March 05, 2016 @07:19PM (#11231810)
Shouldn't internalizers be required to use direct feeds instead of the SIP? The SIP, by construction, will always be lagging the 'real' (if that even means anything) NBBO.
Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by nanexllc on Saturday March 05, 2016 @07:49PM (#11231907)
Internalizers use both. The give retail the slower price, and buy and sell on their own account at the faster price. Nanex has uncovered a document from the NYSE stating that this is the case.
Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by consz on Saturday March 05, 2016 @08:00PM (#11231945)
Let me be more clear -- if internalizers are regulated to use anything, why aren't they regulated to use the direct feeds specifically? If the regulation specifically allows them to use the SIP, that seems to be a failure of the regulation itself.