News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why not C++?. Parent comment

Re:Why not C++? by philbo on Saturday March 05, 2016 @03:12PM (#11230852)
It's not exactly the same, but the closest thing to a "C++: The Good Parts" is Scott Meyers' "Effective C++", imho.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why not C++? by bloodorange on Saturday March 05, 2016 @03:13PM (#11230863)
Unfortunately, there are no updated versions of his books for C++14 or 17.

I owe a lot to the books though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why not C++? by santaclaus on Saturday March 05, 2016 @03:16PM (#11230875)
Effective Modern C++ covers C++14, and specifically points out where it differs from C++11 (I'm thinking about the discussion of decltype, here).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why not C++? by lmedinas on Saturday March 05, 2016 @04:12PM (#11231106)
Trust me even though it's not updated everything he mentions in the book is still valid. If you want to really know more about specifically modern C++ there is always Modern Effective C++
[ Parent | on HN ]