News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX SES-9 Mission Live Webcast by mikeash on Friday March 04, 2016 @07:15PM (#11227739)
I don't think any of the landing crashes so far have been due to the barge's size or movement. It's always been problems with the rocket, not the barge.
Re:SpaceX SES-9 Mission Live Webcast by m_mueller on Friday March 04, 2016 @09:28PM (#11228146)
It's hard to tell really. If the barge was bigger it basically means more leanient constraints for the final approach, which could result in a softer landing. Remember that Falcons can't hover and thus have to achieve perfect timing for the final burn. If you constrain time down to almost zero and space down to a few meters and the initial velocity is terminal velocity + pretty fast horicontal movement, it's almost a wonder that they're already doing what they're doing.
Re:SpaceX SES-9 Mission Live Webcast by mikeash on Friday March 04, 2016 @09:55PM (#11228212)
The causes of the earlier failures were insufficient hydraulic fluid, a sticky valve, and a landing leg that didn't lock. I don't see any of those being helped by a bigger target.
Re:SpaceX SES-9 Mission Live Webcast by Coincoin on Friday March 04, 2016 @09:53PM (#11228210)
Last time it effectively landed correctly in pretty rough conditions. The only problem was a landing leg did not lock because of ice and the stage was lost.
Re:SpaceX SES-9 Mission Live Webcast by stcredzero on Friday March 04, 2016 @07:22PM (#11227763)
You're probably right. If they needed that stuff they'd probably build it. But I bet that what I suggest would result in being able to land in rougher weather with better media from 1st stage landings.
Re:SpaceX SES-9 Mission Live Webcast by mikeash on Friday March 04, 2016 @07:33PM (#11227803)
I imagine so. I'm not sure how much they care about the satellite feed, but handling rough weather would definitely be a plus. There was already one landing attempt that they had to give up on because weather was good at the launch site but bad out at sea.