News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by 0x0 on Friday March 04, 2016 @05:34PM (#11227325)
LOL, "lync.exe" a.k.a. "Skype for Business".

1. The worst brand management this side of 1984. "Skype for Business" has nothing to do with Skype and the .exe is still called "lync.exe"

2. SDK: Trying to use the C# SDK for even simple tasks leaves your app deadlocking or spinning 100% CPU in threads you didn't create or throwing native exceptions that doesn't make any sense as they are referencing raw hex 0x12345678 pointers or COM objects you never even touched. And if you try to watchdog all that have fun with 5 orphaned lync.exe's claiming your USB audio/video device.

Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by spdustin on Friday March 04, 2016 @06:38PM (#11227597)
Microsoft products are filled with references left behind by what I can only assume to be developers who were just hoping to get on a different product team after their next review.

SharePoint's virtual path for its SOAP services is "_vti_bin". VTI = Vermeer Technologies Incorporated, the makers of FrontPage and the FrontPage Server Extensions.

Then there was Groove (brought in Ray Ozzie's luggage) that was renamed SharePoint Workspace (groove.exe).

SharePoint Designer (which didn't actually have a visual designer in the 2013, and final, release) crashes when performing some operations in source files ... With an exception in the FPEDITAX.DLL (FrontPage Editor ActiveX).

Those can all almost be forgiven - they are like vestigial organs after each product evolved into something else.

Until you get to OneDrive. smh

Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by yuhong on Friday March 04, 2016 @11:15PM (#11228394)
Until recently, the Sysinternals executables was signed with a Microsoft certificate but the drivers inside Process Explorer was still signed under the old pre-acquisition certificate (I think they actually even renewed it too)!
Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by bitJericho on Friday March 04, 2016 @08:51PM (#11228049)
I knew OneDrive was going to be the punchline -_- So much wasted time.
Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by bbcbasic on Saturday March 05, 2016 @01:55AM (#11228700)
Can you or the GP explain?
Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by bitJericho on Saturday March 05, 2016 @02:12AM (#11228734)
OneDrive For Business is pretty much unusable:

https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/2ex10y/onedrive_f...

Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by douche on Saturday March 05, 2016 @12:02AM (#11228491)
That SDK is just awful. The sample applications don't even compile, and the documentation is woeful. Tends to make the Lync client leak memory like a sieve, to boot - which is loads of fun, since there is no way to ensure that anything gets cleaned up properly, not an IDisposable in sight.

If it wasn't such a huge PITA to find a compatible SIP library, or write one from scratch, I'd have dumped it long ago. Sadly, I've had to do enough with it that I'm probably an "expert" at it now...

Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by ethbro on Saturday March 05, 2016 @01:35PM (#11230386)
> Sadly, I've had to do enough with it that I'm probably an "expert" at it now...

I think this explains a lot of poorly designed but complex enterprise software (e.g. MS). People eventually learn to deal -> poor design becomes less of a pain point -> less incentive to fix issues.

Re:Source: Microsoft mulled an $8B bid for Slack, will focus... by option_greek on Friday March 04, 2016 @10:56PM (#11228345)
+1 for pointing out the useless slow grinding garbage this lync-skype chimera is.