Re:The cult of memory: when history does more harm than good
by CM30 on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @08:06PM
(#11214351)
You mean like a significant amount of the 'social justice' movement, that seem to be hellbent on attacking people based on their ancestors being such and such hundreds of years ago? Some of the exact people who the Guardian itself seems to like appealing to?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The cult of memory: when history does more harm than good
by gnaritas on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @08:23PM
(#11214416)
That's not even close to what social justice is about; the issue isn't what anyone's ancestors did, it's about the lingering effects of their prejudice that are still embedded into our systems and culture thus still affecting people today. No black person alive today was a slave, but they're still suffering the cultural prejudice that came from the slave era, things like mandatory minimum sentences that are much harsher on drugs common to the poor and black than the white an well off is one of many such examples. Bigotry is alive and well even today and minorities still suffer constantly from it; that's what social justice is about, recognizing that things like slavery may no longer exist, but it's effects still do and so it's still a problem that needs addressed.
Re:The cult of memory: when history does more harm than good
by CM30 on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @08:40PM
(#11214483)
What about those who seem quite happy about such recent incidents as students literally burning 'colonial' artwork or asking for statues to be removed? That seems pretty extreme.
No one's saying the legal system is fine (though that said, it should be pointed out that it's biased in more ways than one and on more than race), but there's definitely a bunch of people trying to tar everyone with the same brush, and thinking that certain things are the only differentiators.
Re:The cult of memory: when history does more harm than good
by chillwaves on Thursday March 03, 2016 @09:37PM
(#11221694)