Re:Adobe blocking publication of latest HTML5 draft?
by voidpointer on Friday February 12, 2010 @08:54AM
(#1120516)
I don't see how HTML5 makes authoring tools (commercial or not) redundant. Do you expect people that are relying on visual authoring software to migrate to writing HTML5/JS/CSS in a text editor "just because"?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Adobe blocking publication of latest HTML5 draft?
by bensummers on Friday February 12, 2010 @09:07AM
(#1120549)
I meant their particular authoring tools, which output Flash rather than HTML5.
They could adjust them to output HTML5 with Flash fallback, and that would be a Good Thing. But it seems odd to keep on going with a poorly integrated[1] plugin which duplicates the work done in open HTML+JS runtimes available everywhere from desktops to smartphones[2].
1) eg Flash 'cookies' which don't get wiped when you delete your cookies in the browser.
2) And 'superphones', of course. :-)
Re:Adobe blocking publication of latest HTML5 draft?
by voidpointer on Friday February 12, 2010 @09:57AM
(#1120658)
So we agree that there is a lot of room for innovation in the space of tools enabling people to output to the HTML5 stack.
Re:Adobe blocking publication of latest HTML5 draft?
by bensummers on Friday February 12, 2010 @10:13AM
(#1120708)
Absolutely. And it would be a good thing, since every new internet connected platform is going to implement an HTML5 runtime, and the more people who can create stuff the better.