Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ...
by trelltron on Tuesday March 01, 2016 @10:36AM
(#11203259)
I have no idea how you could get that second interpretation from what he said. And the perspective is clearly inherited from the parent comment, who didn't mention being "on board" a bus, just "on the road with" a bus.
No ambiguity in that comment that I can see.
EDIT: I guess the use of rather in this context could be a colloquialism?
The sentence could be read as "I prefer to be on the road with a bus since I think it's safer". Or it could be "choosing what's most dangerous, I'd rather say it's a bus".
It's also not clear what the perspective of the speaker is. It might be that a bus is safer for the rider, but more dangerous for cars around it. So would he rather be on board a bus, or rather on the road with a bus?