News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comparing Rust and Java by koide on Tuesday March 01, 2016 @08:00AM (#11202269)
Symbol heavy syntax as opposed to symbol free xml? Could you elaborate?
Re:Comparing Rust and Java by lmm on Tuesday March 01, 2016 @06:38PM (#11207059)
XML uses three symbols: <, >, and /. And it's a well-known, documented standard. Looking at the last project I depended on, its build.sbt uses :=, %, %%, /, <+=, <<= (in addition to standard Scala symbols like +=, ++=, ++, =>, <=, >=, which an inexperienced developer wouldn't necessarily realise weren't part of SBT's own syntax). That's not an exhaustive list (I've used :+= and :++= as examples in another thread) and I have no idea where to find one. Heck, I've been a professional Scala developer for 5 years and I have literally no idea what <+= or <<= mean.
Re:Comparing Rust and Java by llogiq on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @05:42AM (#11209146)
You forgot &entities;

And there is an oft-documented overuse of custom operators among Scala programmers, however I don't have sufficient expertise to gauge the resulting problems in practice.

Re:Comparing Rust and Java by lmm on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @11:01AM (#11210728)
> You forgot &entities;

I did; in fairness I don't think I've ever seen one in a maven pom.xml