News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:52-hertz whale by gaur on Saturday February 27, 2016 @08:39PM (#11189354)
Re:52-hertz whale by Zancarius on Saturday February 27, 2016 @09:23PM (#11189504)
This is why I enjoy the HN comments. Although, I should probably be upset that you sent me down a Wikipedia rabbit hole (the theory is interesting!): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ungulate#Cetacean_evolution
Re:52-hertz whale by DiabloD3 on Saturday February 27, 2016 @09:37PM (#11189540)
This is a real TIL moment right there. Good job, HN. :)
Re:52-hertz whale by baddox on Saturday February 27, 2016 @11:30PM (#11189856)
Although, from Wikipedia:

> As a descriptive term, "ungulate" normally excludes cetaceans (whales, dolphins, porpoises), as they do not possess most of the typical morphological characteristics of ungulates, but recent discoveries indicate that they are descended from early artiodactyls.

Re:52-hertz whale by selfsimilar on Saturday February 27, 2016 @09:52PM (#11189590)
What the what?! I stand corrected, though how I'm standing with my mind splattered across the ceiling, I'm not sure...
Re:52-hertz whale by robbrown451 on Saturday February 27, 2016 @11:07PM (#11189790)
I don't think whales are considered ungulates, it is just that ungulate is no longer considered a monophyletic category (but cetartiodactyla is).
Re:52-hertz whale by knughit on Saturday February 27, 2016 @10:07PM (#11189638)
Are you proposing that this creature might be a hippo, or were you showing off your knowledge of recent re-orderization? Do non-cetacean ungulates call like cetaceans?