News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Doing Mathematics Differently by tel on Saturday February 27, 2016 @12:31AM (#11186200)
Not necessarily. It's very possible for one system to embed inside the other. In this case you can often talk about exactly the same axiom/theorem/whatever within different inferential systems.

An interesting example is the Axiom of Choice which is, naively encoded, a theorem of intuitionistic logic. That said, we can use flattening to embed classical logic inside of intuitionistic logic and then recover a whole family of propositions of which AC is one and also see why it has a difficult time holding in IPL.

Re:Doing Mathematics Differently by catnaroek on Saturday February 27, 2016 @02:38AM (#11186422)
> An interesting example is the Axiom of Choice which is, naively encoded, a theorem of intuitionistic logic.

Naïvely encoded in Martin-Löf type theory, that is.

Re:Doing Mathematics Differently by plutooo on Saturday February 27, 2016 @06:46AM (#11186849)
Still, "axiom of choice is a theorem in intuitionistic logic" is absolutely true whether or not you accept intuitionistic logic.
Re:Doing Mathematics Differently by pfortuny on Saturday February 27, 2016 @10:16AM (#11187274)
But thas is not Mathematics, they call it "metamathematics" for something.