Re:FreeBSD and ZFS
by the_ancient on Friday February 26, 2016 @09:46PM
(#11185821)
Because ZFS is 100000000000X better than btrfs...
the ZFS commands are more logical, and better designed
The ZFS FileSystem is truely enterprise ready... btrfs is atleast 5 years away from being production ready
btrfs has all kinds of bugs and issues.
zfs did not hold to legacy conventions, they looked at filesystems in a differnet way.
btrfs attempts to hold on the traditional filesystem methodology and shoehorn more modern ideas in to that traditional framework, and IMO it does not work at all
the zfs and zpool commands are brilliant, intuitive, and easy to use.
The btrfs command structure is complicated, non-intuitive, and antiquated
the ZFS commands are more logical, and better designed
The ZFS FileSystem is truely enterprise ready... btrfs is atleast 5 years away from being production ready
btrfs has all kinds of bugs and issues.
zfs did not hold to legacy conventions, they looked at filesystems in a differnet way.
btrfs attempts to hold on the traditional filesystem methodology and shoehorn more modern ideas in to that traditional framework, and IMO it does not work at all
the zfs and zpool commands are brilliant, intuitive, and easy to use.
The btrfs command structure is complicated, non-intuitive, and antiquated