Cryptome’s critique of Snowden Inc.

Re:Cryptome’s critique of Snowden Inc. by smcl on Thursday February 25, 2016 @11:33AM (#11175523)

That is not what the GP post is taking issue with. They are saying that it looks like someone got a new Thesaurus for their birthday and went wild trying to sound smarter than they were.

FWIW I agree with the GP- there's no reason for anyone to talk this way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cryptome’s critique of Snowden Inc. by acqq on Thursday February 25, 2016 @01:01PM (#11176269)

> That is not what the GP post is taking issue with

Well, "that" is the answer to GP's:

> Do people take Cryptome seriously?

And I consider it much more important than which specific words were used. Don't shoot the messenger, let's talk about the substance or the truthness of the message.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cryptome’s critique of Snowden Inc. by smcl on Thursday February 25, 2016 @01:21PM (#11176453)

Fair point

[ Parent | on HN ]