News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No patent if invention lies only in computer program, say... by f00fc0d3 on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @05:03AM (#11165646)
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. I am doing baseband SW in tier1 vendor, and we have no processes, crappy tools (maybe you consider git and clang a crappy tool?) and don't give a flying f##k about management.

...and this is funny that you consider advanced signal processing, numerical analysis, SoC architecture, discrete optimization a CS 101 - what a joke.

Re:No patent if invention lies only in computer program, say... by raverbashing on Wednesday February 24, 2016 @05:43AM (#11165781)
> maybe you consider git and clang a crappy tool?

No I don't, and good for you that doesn't work with bozos that like ClearCrap, oops, ClearCase. Apparently they evolved

> that you consider advanced signal processing

No, I don't consider that simple, but sometimes the frontend signal processing is split (DSP stays in one part and higher level processing in another part)

> numerical analysis, SoC architecture, discrete optimization

Well, SoC architecture is hardware, no?

Re:No patent if invention lies only in computer program, say... by mangamadaiyan on Thursday February 25, 2016 @12:47AM (#11172615)
Why the downvotes?