Re:Issues with corporate censorship and mass surveillance
by secfirstmd on Monday February 22, 2016 @12:38PM
(#11152616)
I thought the issue is not a TOR server behind a CF but how CF deals with TOR users going to regular non .onion sites.
Re:Issues with corporate censorship and mass surveillance
by cyphar on Monday February 22, 2016 @05:56PM
(#11155034)
Running an onion service behind CF (apart from being basically impossible) would lose many of the useful features of onion services. The topic being discussed is accessing clearnet websites hosted behind CF using Tor. Speaking personally, I've had to solve endless amounts of Captcha every fucking day. It actually makes me reconsider how important the site I'm trying to view is, because CF is trying to make it hard for me to read information anonymously.
Re:Issues with corporate censorship and mass surveillance
by secfirstmd on Monday February 22, 2016 @07:18PM
(#11155449)
Ditto
Re:Issues with corporate censorship and mass surveillance
by jc4p on Monday February 22, 2016 @01:33PM
(#11153101)
This isn't what anyone except you is talking about. The issue is being unable to access CF secured clearnet websites using the Tor Browser Bundle (or any other way to route your traffic through Tor).
Re:Issues with corporate censorship and mass surveillance
by bogus- on Monday February 22, 2016 @12:51PM
(#11152709)
> I'm skeptical that cloud flare can somehow be roped into 'corporate censorship' -- they IMHO clearly were not founded or intended to enable some sort of nefarious intent. Quite the opposite in fact.
The fact that CloudFlare makes it challenging for users from a particular network to access common resources is, in itself, a form of censorship. This is especially problematic due to the nature of people who tend to use Tor, i.e. those who seek some level of anonymity for various reasons. I don't believe CloudFlare is malicious or intends to block legitimate Tor users. But it is censorship nonetheless, hence the title.
I'm skeptical that cloud flare can somehow be roped into 'corporate censorship' -- they IMHO clearly were not founded or intended to enable some sort of nefarious intent. Quite the opposite in fact.
TLDR: The title of this article is dubious or even trolling