Re:Why C++ sucks (2016 edition)
by chris_wot on Monday February 22, 2016 @09:01AM
(#11150797)
But with any complex interface, wouldn't it be a good idea to introduce a less complex facade that only deals with common usecases, and for complex use cases use that underlying interface?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
The whole point of the complexity chrono interface is to prevent mistakes caused by accidentally mixing different units. Providing a default unsafe interface would completely defeat the point.
That an interesting point of view to take in defence of C++ of all things.
Sorry, I might misparsing your replay, but are you saying that std::chrono is overly strict? Or that because C++ (and its C heritage) has allowed unsafe implicit conversions in the past, it should continue doing it in the future?