Re:Snowden: FBI obscuring crucial details in Apple case
by kaitai on Saturday February 20, 2016 @11:59AM
(#11140847)
Not everyone's individual rights. I didn't see Scalia standing up for my right to do what I want with my female body, for instance. (I know the counterargument is that fetal rights are more important, but then the fact remains: not my rights.)
Scalia also didn't think that women were protected from discriminatory laws under the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment (interview in California Lawyer, 2011).
I just have to conclude he thought some individuals (and corporations) were more equal -- and have more rights -- than others.
Scalia also didn't think that women were protected from discriminatory laws under the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment (interview in California Lawyer, 2011).
I just have to conclude he thought some individuals (and corporations) were more equal -- and have more rights -- than others.