Why Don't People Manage Debt Better?

Re:Why Don't People Manage Debt Better? by modfodder on Friday February 19, 2016 @03:07PM (#11136219)

There still isn't a TV on the market (that I know of) that is obsolete after a year, not even five years. As long as the inputs (hdmi, dvi, RCA) work then the TV is not obsolete. It may not have the newest features (4k, "smart" connectivity) but it is every bit as usable (and many of the smart features can be added with a ROKU, Apple TV or the like).

Video and Films are my business and my TV is a nearly 5 year old LG plasma that still performs great. And I only bought it because my ex kept the Panasonic plasma after the break-up or I'd probably be using an 8 year old TV.

Are there any reports of smart TVs not working completely (inputs stop working) because the "smart" connected features stop working?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Don't People Manage Debt Better? by gordyf on Friday February 19, 2016 @06:19PM (#11137519)

While I agree that TVs don't go obsolete after one year, obsolete doesn't mean "broken" or "no longer works", it just means that the item is outdated or outmoded and generally no longer used. Ball mice, for example, are obsolete but would still work if plugged into a computer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Don't People Manage Debt Better? by modfodder on Saturday February 20, 2016 @01:48PM (#11141292)

Losing one function or even several doesn't automatically make something obsolete (outdated, outmoded and generally no longer used) if it's still functional for it's main purpose. Ball mice are obsolete mainly because no one is making mice that aren't optical/laser (AFAIK). A TV losing a smart function doesn't make that TV obsolete unless the person using the TV was relying heavily on the smart functions. And even then I wouldn't necessarily say that the TV was obsolete mainly because the smart functions on TV are used by a small percentage of consumers, typically less than 15%.

[ Parent | on HN ]