Re:Uber losing $1B a year to compete in China
by voltagex_ on Friday February 19, 2016 @04:21AM
(#11132492)
There's even more wrong with the parent comment
1. It assumes you don't need to be technically savvy to drive a taxi (where?))
2. It assumes you can make a living (where?) driving taxis
3. It assumes the reason some people might be out of a job is because they can't adapt to one particular kind of app (hint - Uber isn't the only "taxi" app).
1. It assumes you don't need to be technically savvy to drive a taxi (where?))
2. It assumes you can make a living (where?) driving taxis
3. It assumes the reason some people might be out of a job is because they can't adapt to one particular kind of app (hint - Uber isn't the only "taxi" app).