News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform. Parent comment

Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by zenlikethat on Thursday February 18, 2016 @02:41AM (#11124302)
Right? An ES replacement in Go would be so great.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by sz4kerto on Thursday February 18, 2016 @04:05AM (#11124543)
Why do you care of the language?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by glial on Thursday February 18, 2016 @07:23AM (#11125238)
For one thing it means you wouldn't have to screw around with the peculiarities of the JVM.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by zenlikethat on Thursday February 18, 2016 @08:23PM (#11130860)
Ridiculously easy deployment and lower memory footprint.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by alexott on Thursday February 18, 2016 @06:47AM (#11125115)
Is there already Lucene for Go? ;-)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by vruiz on Thursday February 18, 2016 @07:25AM (#11125255)
http://www.blevesearch.com/

It has an very long way ahead to catch up with Lucene, but it's a very promising start.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by rakoo on Thursday February 18, 2016 @04:04PM (#11129300)
Naïve question from a bystander: how much better is Lucene compared to bleve ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Elastic Stack: Future of ELK Platform by eternalban on Thursday February 18, 2016 @12:18PM (#11127388)
/aside: I get rewriting for the n-th time some utility (say a db driver) in language du jour, but (possibly poorly) replicating things like Lucene never made sense. Lucene is a fairly solid tech by all accounts.
[ Parent | on HN ]