News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by jchendy on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @03:33PM (#11121094)
I'm not a doctor, but from the outside, it seems that practicing medicine is mostly about memorizing a whole bunch of things and then doing them correctly over and over again.

Law actually seems quite similar to programming. You can think of the jury as your users and facts/precedent/laws as the statements available in your programming language. Then your job is to assemble the statements into a program that compiles and that your users want to buy.

Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by dms105 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:19PM (#11121491)
I like the law/programming analogy, but theres probably more of a margin for error when your job is to convince some people, depending on if you're prosecuting or defending. If you make even a small mistake when programming, it could break your entire program.
Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by grillvogel on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:50PM (#11121717)
if you make one "small mistake" while lawyering an innocent person might get sentenced to death.

why do so many programmers think their job is inherently more special and difficult than everyone else's?

Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by jchendy on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @05:35PM (#11122090)
> why do so many programmers think their job is inherently more special and difficult than everyone else's?

Probably largely because they get paid more than all of their peers when they start their careers.

Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by dms105 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @08:38PM (#11123049)
You misinterpreted what I was trying to say. I was simply trying to highlight that theres a difference between dealing with people and dealing with a perfectly logical machine, to support the point that interviewing programmers is harder than interviewing lawyers. And I'm not a programmer.
Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by acheron on Thursday February 18, 2016 @09:30AM (#11125936)
There are easily many more programmers who work on potentially life-or-death systems than there are lawyers who litigate death-penalty cases in court.
Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by dragonwriter on Thursday February 18, 2016 @09:39AM (#11125993)
> There are easily many more programmers who work on potentially life-or-death systems than there are lawyers who litigate death-penalty cases in court.

But potentially life-or-death cases are not limited to death penalty cases, they are just the most obvious class of cases that are life-or-death.

There are far greater numbers (and proportion) of lawyers who work on potentially life-and-death work -- not limited to death penalty cases -- than programmers who do so.

Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary by acheron on Thursday February 18, 2016 @01:19PM (#11127919)
Well, the OP said "sentenced to death" specifically, which is why I mentioned the death penalty. But ok. Either way I still don't think I agree, though frankly I'm just going off gut feeling and don't have any numbers. But think about how much medical device software is out there, plus industrial control equipment, airplanes and other vehicles, military stuff, etc. I know on HN the image of "programmer" is "person taking VC money to write a photo sharing app" but there's a lot of other work out there.

Though for what it's worth this is less a "programmers are awesome and important!" argument than it is a "don't get your view of lawyers from television shows" argument -- if the OP had gone with doctors or something I wouldn't have said anything.