News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by donbox on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:45AM (#11116070)
It costs 251 INR to be exact. That's 3.654 USD as per today's exchange rate.

Specifications at a glance:

-- Android Lollipop 5.1

-- 4 inch qHD display

-- 1.3 Ghz Quadcore processor

-- 1 GB RAM

-- 8 GB internal memory, expandable to 32 GB

-- 1450 mAh battery

-- 3.2 MP AF Rear camera, .3 MP Front

Re:The 4$ smartphone by nitin_flanker on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:42AM (#11116602)
The specs are great but, what actually 4inch qHD means? Quad HD or is it some sort of marketing slang?
Re:The 4$ smartphone by duskwuff on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:50AM (#11116660)
qHD is a standard display resolution: 960x540. Not to be confused with QHD (2560x1440).
Re:The 4$ smartphone by nitin_flanker on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @06:19AM (#11117037)
Thanks, I just figured out that it's for Quater HD, not Quad HD.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by tracker1 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @09:27PM (#11123250)
I can't see fine detail that small/close anyway. My OPO is set to max fonts, and I still tend to zoom sometimes in browser.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by agumonkey on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @06:30AM (#11117097)
> qHD

What a beautiful acronym. I only see the HD part.

Re:The 4$ smartphone by tkinom on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @10:53AM (#11118636)
Not only it is HD, it is q too. :-)
Re:The 4$ smartphone by AstralStorm on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @03:31AM (#11116252)
Specs not mentioned are all PET construction. It won't be durable.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by EliRivers on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:29AM (#11116516)
At that price, I don't need it to be. I could imagine having a box of these and as I destroy each one, recovering only the SIM. Which I then swallow.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by dheera on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @09:08AM (#11117901)
Humor aside, non-durable construction creates more electronic waste. For a place with 1 billion+ people I'd think twice before creating something that won't last.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by chippy on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @09:21AM (#11117974)
How about if it was made with more recyclable material? Or if it was made using recycled material (not the same thing as the first) Phones generally are not recyclable.

I'd imagine there being a balance point of the volume of waste and the environmental effect.

Re:The 4$ smartphone by DanBC on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @09:30AM (#11118017)
> Phones generally are not recyclable.

People recover the gold. One ton of ore gives one gram of gold; you get about a gram from about 40-50 smart phones.

Re:The 4$ smartphone by arikrak on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @08:18AM (#11117611)
Don't swallow the SIM or the government will be able to track you forever...
Re:The 4$ smartphone by oneeyedpigeon on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @08:28AM (#11117654)
Well, for a day or two ...
Re:The 4$ smartphone by pestaa on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @07:01AM (#11117228)
Sounds like you already have a particular use case in mind.
[dead]
Re:The 4$ smartphone by fgtx on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @09:31AM (#11118020)
Mr. Pool, is that you?
Re:The 4$ smartphone by pedalpete on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @03:28AM (#11116240)
It's also only 3g, but if you're not into photography and mostly use wifi, it could be a good little device.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by creshal on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @06:14AM (#11117019)
3G is already faster than "broadband" in most parts of the world. It's good enough.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by ju-st on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @07:11AM (#11117274)
When I'm at home and my 3G phone loads everything faster than expected I know that Wifi isn't enabled...
Re:The 4$ smartphone by creshal on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @08:35AM (#11117693)
Same here. When I recently had to upload a 3 GB file, I split it in 3 and uploaded one part with each of my (3G) phones… 45 minutes instead of the 4 hours it would have taken me with my ADSL line.
Re:The 4$ smartphone by bduerst on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:45PM (#11119639)
Found my fellow Comcast customer :/
Re:The 4$ smartphone by ggoss on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @06:24PM (#11122404)
Just as bad here with AT&T (Uverse)
Re:The 4$ smartphone by ck2 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @10:13AM (#11118324)
3G has a wide range of specs - at its lowest it is only twice dialup speed.

Developers should actually test their websites at 3G speeds and latency.

Re:The 4$ smartphone by creshal on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @10:22AM (#11118388)
144 Kbit/s is legally considered "broadband" in Austria. Although ISPs are usually generous enough to offer 384k minimum.