News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Glibc getaddrinfo stack-based buffer overflow by autoreleasepool on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @11:59AM (#11111246)
I mean, what problem is this solving?

There's no technical reason why it can't be done, true. It's still a hilariously bad idea that would never succeed. That's aside from the fact that's a completely pointless wheel-reinventing endeavor. Rewrites in general are pretty difficult to justify.

Sorry, I guess my aggressively pragmatic side is showing today. The idea is really dumb.

To be honest, "Let's rewrite the C standard library in Rust" is one of the worst pieces of bikeshedding drivel I've ever read. And I like Rust 100 times more than I like C.

Re:Glibc getaddrinfo stack-based buffer overflow by zebra1287 on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @05:34PM (#11113665)
It will be finished together with GNU HURD.
Re:Glibc getaddrinfo stack-based buffer overflow by theseoafs on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @03:55AM (#11116344)
The problem that it's solving is security vulnerabilities like this one.