Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by 0x0 on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @01:38AM
(#11108270)
Lack of support for wildcard certificates is still an issue for Let's Encrypt. Rate limiting and SNI are two issues that means a wildcard certificate is still highly desirable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by DanielDent on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @04:41AM
(#11108801)
Windows XP & older Android releases are the two most common reasons to care about SNI.
Let's Encrypt actually has compatibility issues with Windows XP, so wildcard certificates wouldn't help.
https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/which-browsers-and-opera...
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by EwanToo on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @02:19AM
(#11108371)
I'm struggling to think of a browser that supports SHA-2 TLS encryption, and doesn't support SNI, which one am I missing?
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by 0x0 on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @03:17AM
(#11108530)
Windows XP and Android 2.x comes to mind. Non-HTTP protocols (IMAP, SMTP, XMPP, SIP etc) may also struggle with SNI.
But the biggest problem here is wildcarded subdomains, since LE doesn't let you get more than 5 certificates per domain.
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by jhkaghjkga on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @03:34AM
(#11108574)
That's wrong. You can get more than 5 certs/domain: either you have to wait a week (it's 5 certs/domain/week), or you include multiple hostnames in a single certificate (up to 100 IIRC). The latter would allow 500 subdomains/week.
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by 0x0 on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @04:08AM
(#11108674)
That's quite limiting if you are handling customer signups, and it still breaks SNI-less clients except for the first batch.
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by Tepix on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @03:48AM
(#11108615)
Windows XP and Android 2.x both have big security problems. You should encourage your users to upgrade.
Also I think with Firefox on Windows XP it should work.
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by 0x0 on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @04:07AM
(#11108672)
That doesn't help when you are targeting a market where Android 2.x is prevalent.
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by Tepix on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @04:16AM
(#11108701)
True. Is there no workaround for Android 2.x? What if you install a 3rd party browser?
Re:Why I stopped using StartSSL (Hint: it involves a Chinese...
by 0x0 on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @04:41AM
(#11108802)
You'd probably have to bring your own SSL stack, which is not something you'd want to do for several reasons (staying on top of code patches, maintaining a CA root store, integrating any custom CA roots the user has added, handling any custom HTTP proxy settings, etc).