News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Web fundamentals – performance. Parent comment

Re:Web fundamentals – performance by wprapido on Monday February 15, 2016 @11:11AM (#11104087)
i've already ditched EOT and the performance improvement is quite significant
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web fundamentals – performance by realityking on Monday February 15, 2016 @01:17PM (#11104931)
I'm a bit surprised. Despite saving a couple of bytes of CSS, where should a performance improvement come from?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web fundamentals – performance by wprapido on Monday February 15, 2016 @03:45PM (#11105802)
EOT are heavy muthafukkas. also, you save a lot by loading WOFF only, what's pretty obvious
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web fundamentals – performance by chain18 on Monday February 15, 2016 @05:58PM (#11106704)
Browsers should load only the WOFF file if it is supported though right? Which means if you link to a EOT on a WOFF supporting browser it shouldn't make a difference?
[ Parent | on HN ]