News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Is Python dying? by dagw on Monday February 15, 2016 @05:08AM (#11102521)
What was so unreasonable about 1.5? That was my first python and it worked perfectly fine.
Re:Ask HN: Is Python dying? by stray on Monday February 15, 2016 @08:27AM (#11103243)
Old style classes. No way to subclass built-in types. No metaclasses.
Re:Ask HN: Is Python dying? by dagw on Monday February 15, 2016 @08:31AM (#11103263)
Sure, but non of those things made it a bad language, or where really unreasonable things to have left out.
Re:Ask HN: Is Python dying? by stray on Tuesday February 16, 2016 @10:51AM (#11110619)
There is a big difference between unreasonable and bad.

Python was always a good language because it was basically the same pseudocode we all scribbled on blackboards anyway -- with the added advantage that computers could execute it.

I just found 1.x to be unreasonable. I also find 3.x unreasonable for unreasonable reasons.

Re:Ask HN: Is Python dying? by eru on Monday February 15, 2016 @04:45PM (#11106270)
For me it's lack of lexical scoping.