Re:Wikipedia starts work on $2.5M internet search engine pro...
by chris_wot on Sunday February 14, 2016 @09:56PM
(#11101270)
To be clear: my issue (and in fact, most peoples' issues) are not with the Knight Foundation. In fact, they appear to have been above board in every way in this whole debacle. It is the WMF board who are the problem here.
See my comment here for just a few comments on this issue:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11101262
Frankly, there's a lot more - to understand the issue better you might want to read Liam Wyatt's blog posts:
http://wittylama.com/2016/01/08/strategy-and-controversy/
and here:
http://wittylama.com/2016/01/30/strategy-controversy-part-2/
Re:Wikipedia starts work on $2.5M internet search engine pro...
by incongruity on Sunday February 14, 2016 @11:23PM
(#11101503)
Thanks – I appreciate the references
Re:Wikipedia starts work on $2.5M internet search engine pro...
by chris_wot on Sunday February 14, 2016 @11:30PM
(#11101522)
That's OK, ironically it was Wikipedia that taught me to always back up my statements with references :-)
Re:Wikipedia starts work on $2.5M internet search engine pro...
by incongruity on Sunday February 14, 2016 @11:38PM
(#11101542)
As an aside, I think the internet is simultaneously great at spreading absolute bs and disinformation and pushing people to have citations handy... paradoxically, both seem to be getting more frequent. (It all depends on where you browse, clearly).
Re:Wikipedia starts work on $2.5M internet search engine pro...
by chris_wot on Monday February 15, 2016 @12:01AM
(#11101607)
Yeah, nobody knows this more than myself. I created [citation needed] and I've watched it be misused for years. I am glad I came up with the idea, but I'm resigned to the fact that it's human nature to misuse a valuable idea.
The Knight Foundation is about as upstanding as you can get, so it can't be that (full disclosure, I've received funding from them, so I'm definitely not unbiased on that point). So, what exactly is it that's so shameful here?