Re:Base Ten for Almost Everything
by andromeduck on Sunday February 14, 2016 @03:34PM
(#11099876)
The byte notation doesn't make any sense to me if you're using SI. It's kind of like saying Giga Inches or KiloCM, just seems wrong
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I'd consider a byte to be like a mole: it's the base unit that we actually use, and it's proper to apply an SI prefix to, but it's defined as a specific multiple of a smaller unit (8 bits vs 6.02 * 10^^23 particles).
"Giga inches" sounds wrong for two reasons: first, that larger distances like that are customarily expressed in units more suited to their scale, and second, that that measurement system generally doesn't use SI-style prefixes.
"KiloCM" sounds wrong because you're applying two SI prefixes to one unit and using the wrong capitalization for both "centi" and "meter". kcm could technically be represented by the "dam" unit, although it's more common to show things in that scale just as meters.
Re:Base Ten for Almost Everything
by brucedawson on Monday February 15, 2016 @06:43PM
(#11106926)
KiloCM does sound wrong, but it is interesting that we happily say "1,000 km", when we could say "1 Gm". Fashion and familiarity in that case.
I need to remember to say "it's 3.8 Gm from Seattle to New York".
Re:Base Ten for Almost Everything
by andromeduck on Sunday February 14, 2016 @06:48PM
(#11100610)
Well KiloMol is pretty weird too.
IDK,I just think going with bits is neater.