Re:Memory Usage of Firefox with e10s Enabled
by lucian1900 on Friday February 12, 2016 @02:31PM
(#11089816)
Actually, Chrome does process-per-domain. Almost always several tabs of the same domain will share a process. You can check this by killing one process and seeing lots of tabs go away.
Re:Memory Usage of Firefox with e10s Enabled
by justinschuh on Friday February 12, 2016 @03:46PM
(#11090414)
No. We currently mostly do process-per-tab, but it gets complicated depending on how exactly a given window/tab was opened and certain resource heuristics. We're moving to process-per-origin[1], largely for the security improvement. But, that's been a huge, multi-year engineering effort that's only now approaching fruition.
[1] https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/site-is...
Re:Memory Usage of Firefox with e10s Enabled
by lucian1900 on Saturday February 13, 2016 @12:17AM
(#11092665)
I see.
So the reason more than one tab will crash when killing a process is that all those processes were sharing a resource of some sort?
Re:Memory Usage of Firefox with e10s Enabled
by wldcordeiro on Friday February 12, 2016 @02:23PM
(#11089751)
Maybe the trick isn't to do process-per-tab or 1 content process and 1 UI process but to instead do some kind of "intelligent" number of content processes based on CPU and tab count? Like if you had 50 tabs on a quad core processor you could have 1 UI process and say five content processes?
Or another idea, have some kind of upper limit of memory a tab can use before it gets its own process.
Re:Memory Usage of Firefox with e10s Enabled
by nnethercote on Friday February 12, 2016 @06:13PM
(#11091380)
That's likely what'll happen eventually. But we're starting with 1 content process because even that is a huge change and is going to cause disruption and will take a while to iron out the wrinkles.
Chrome does process-per-tab more or less. Current plans for e10s are to start with just 1 content process and see how that can be increased later.
So basically e10s does not suffer per-process-overhead as chrome does. For now.