News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Download.com and Others Bundle Superfish-Style HTTPS Brea... by randunel on Friday February 12, 2016 @08:37AM (#11087018)
Why do you support private companies policing the internet? I'd rather be given the chance to decide what's good or bad for me by myself, instead of having someone else doing this proactively.

A warning would be welcomed, but nothing more.

Re:Download.com and Others Bundle Superfish-Style HTTPS Brea... by delecti on Friday February 12, 2016 @11:11AM (#11088213)
Websites are still accessible if Google delists them.
Re:Download.com and Others Bundle Superfish-Style HTTPS Brea... by whorleater on Friday February 12, 2016 @01:28PM (#11089274)
That's akin to saying if I tore up the road leading to your house, your house is still accessible. You're not wrong, but you can't deny the power that Google has when it comes to access to websites. Furthermore, if Google started delisting some websites, you probably wouldn't even notice, which makes this all the scarier. There's a solution to be found that doesn't involve Google acting as some kind of pseudo-internet police.
Re:Download.com and Others Bundle Superfish-Style HTTPS Brea... by delecti on Friday February 12, 2016 @01:38PM (#11089351)
At the same time, Google has a responsibility to their users. Their search engine is a list of what are likely to be the best results. If a website regularly spreads malware, is it in the best interest of Google's reputation to link to it?