News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:For gifted children, being intelligent can have dark impl... by da1 on Friday February 12, 2016 @07:05AM (#11086653)
Everything that relates to outlier characteristics will disproportionately affect more boys than girls. The more extreme the outlier the much more likely it will be a boy.

This is just basic human biology that like the GP mentioned is routinely deliberately ignored by feminism.

Re:For gifted children, being intelligent can have dark impl... by andrelaszlo on Friday February 12, 2016 @07:18AM (#11086695)
Are you referring to these Bell curves? :P

http://www.slideshare.net/terriko/how-does-biology-explain-t...

Re:For gifted children, being intelligent can have dark impl... by evanpw on Friday February 12, 2016 @07:46AM (#11086806)
I think the GP is referring to differences in standard deviation, not mean, which causes the larger-deviation population to dominate at both the left and right tails.
Re:For gifted children, being intelligent can have dark impl... by Lawtonfogle on Friday February 12, 2016 @11:09AM (#11088194)
I'm not saying the theory is right or wrong, only that people seem to have a much harder time understanding a theory based off of same means but different standard deviations than a theory based off of different means.
Re:For gifted children, being intelligent can have dark impl... by da1 on Friday February 12, 2016 @07:48AM (#11086813)
Totally correct.
Re:For gifted children, being intelligent can have dark impl... by da1 on Friday February 12, 2016 @08:55PM (#11092045)
Not one mention of variance in that presentation.

The author is either ignorant or just dishonest.

Re:For gifted children, being intelligent can have dark impl... by tzs on Friday February 12, 2016 @08:16AM (#11086941)
Or as Helena Cronin succinctly described men: "more dumbbells but more Nobels".