News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Vanguard's Low Blow. Parent comment

[dead]
Re:Vanguard's Low Blow by dang on Friday February 12, 2016 @04:03PM (#11090571)
Please stop being rude in Hacker News comments. This comment breaks the HN guidelines in more ways than one.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vanguard's Low Blow by madaxe_again on Saturday February 13, 2016 @07:22AM (#11093686)
Apologies, and thanks for calling me out on this rather than "go directly to hellban, do not pass go, do not collect $200".

Crappy morning lead to unwarranted piss-poor attitude. No excuse, but wanted you to know that I appreciate rehabilitation rather than punishment!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vanguard's Low Blow by morgante on Friday February 12, 2016 @06:02AM (#11086448)
What? I fully read the article and also Matt Levine's take. [0]

I'm well aware what a mutual fund is and, for the record, think this case is pretty stupid and unlikely to be won. But it's important to understand that there actually are tax principles in play here.

Have you heard of transfer pricing? I suggest reading anything.

[0] http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-11-25/calpers-fee...

[ Parent | on HN ]