Re:Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein R...
by tizzdogg on Thursday February 11, 2016 @02:32PM
(#11082529)
Thanks, that's helpful. It's hard to get my head around the idea that an event so massive can be over so "quickly", without any residual longer-lasting effects.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein R...
by valarauca1 on Thursday February 11, 2016 @04:47PM
(#11083547)
>without any residual longer-lasting effects
A massive ripple in the very fabric of reality?
Re:Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein R...
by tizzdogg on Thursday February 11, 2016 @07:59PM
(#11084617)
Well it sounds like a massive ripple in the fabric of reality which passes by us in a fraction of a second, never to be seen again.
So from my non-physicist point of view, no it doesnt seem like a very long lasting effect, relative to us at least. Thanks for the snark though.
Re:Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein R...
by lutorm on Thursday February 11, 2016 @02:51PM
(#11082680)
You're left with a big-ass black hole...
Re:Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein R...
by lmm on Thursday February 11, 2016 @07:38PM
(#11084541)
There's a theorem that black holes have "no hair": two black holes of the same mass, charge and angular momentum are indistinguishable. So the merge must happen instantaneously: if the combined black hole were "sloshing" afterwards that would violate that theorem.
Re:Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein R...
by spacehome on Thursday February 11, 2016 @08:57PM
(#11084812)
Whether or not black holes have "no hair" is currently an unsolved problem.
Hawking, for instance, believes that the Hawking Radiation from a black hole encodes the information that went into creating the hole.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox...