News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Robin Hood of Science. Parent comment

Re:The Robin Hood of Science by tomp on Thursday February 11, 2016 @03:55AM (#11079043)
Well... you could still make the copy available after the article was published.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Robin Hood of Science by adrianN on Thursday February 11, 2016 @05:13AM (#11079291)
If you don't mind breaking your contract with the publisher.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Robin Hood of Science by tomp on Thursday February 11, 2016 @05:54AM (#11079419)
What can they do against it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Robin Hood of Science by adrianN on Thursday February 11, 2016 @07:09AM (#11079632)
Sue you for damages.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Robin Hood of Science by tomp on Thursday February 11, 2016 @02:41PM (#11082597)
You mean, all $0 of them?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Robin Hood of Science by ___ab___ on Saturday February 13, 2016 @10:29AM (#11094272)
Stop being obstinate. You know exactly what the parent means, and that publishers can sue authors who distribute the works for which they (the publishers) own copyright.
[ Parent | on HN ]