News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by Sophira on Thursday February 11, 2016 @02:53AM (#11078833)
I think I'm missing something. Why not just install the Flash player from Adobe?
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by Ded7xSEoPKYNsDd on Thursday February 11, 2016 @05:22AM (#11079326)
I'm not the person you asked, but here's my reasons.

I'm on Linux and there no longer is a supported version of Flash by Adobe. (Apparently there is some NPAPI to Pepper bridge though, to get Chrome's Flash working in other browsers.)

I already uninstalled before that, because I wanted to force HTML5 for sites that dynamically switch between Flash and HTML5 and because I wanted to nudge more sites to support HTML5 by boosting the stats of people who don't have Flash installed.

Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by jhasse on Thursday February 11, 2016 @06:47AM (#11079556)
> I'm on Linux and there no longer is a supported version of Flash by Adobe

I'm using Firefox on Ubuntu with Flash (flashplugin-installer) and it's still receiving updates. It's an older version, but it has been working fine with every Flash site I've visited so far.

Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by Ded7xSEoPKYNsDd on Thursday February 11, 2016 @07:47AM (#11079780)
Yes, looks like I was misinformed there. While there are no more feature updates, security issues will continue to be released for about another year. (If I'm piecing the information here together correctly https://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadm... https://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/release-note/release-no...)
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by creshal on Thursday February 11, 2016 @07:07AM (#11079627)
Not from my experience. There's quite a few sites that require a newer flash player, so it's either Google's PPAPI Flash or Windows.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by jpwgarrison on Thursday February 11, 2016 @11:31AM (#11081133)
I think everyone got most of my reasons covered below, but here they are: no need to manage updates, smaller security surface, battery life, fan noise. I typically browse with Firefox Nightly, and without flash installed globally I get HTML5 or whatever a site wants to offer me if I don't advertise flash compatibility. If I hit some must-have flash I have a key combo that opens the current tab in Chrome.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by stephen_g on Thursday February 11, 2016 @05:24AM (#11079331)
Historically, it's tended to have had far more zero day exploits than the web browsers themselves. removing Flash removes a huge attack surface, and 95% of the time you don't need it.

I don't have flash installed (usually using Safari and Firefox) and have to jump over to Chrome to use a site maybe once or twice a week, which is more than acceptable given the insecurity of Flash.

Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by sparky_ on Friday February 12, 2016 @02:00AM (#11085719)
I really don't like flash. It's full of security holes and its primary uses annoy the living hell out of me. So I only use a browser that has it when it's on my terms.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by nicky0 on Thursday February 11, 2016 @05:10AM (#11079286)
Then you enter the toxic hellstew of Flash Player updates.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by phpsupport on Thursday February 11, 2016 @03:14AM (#11078904)
don't need to install. Now its default in browser
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by Sophira on Thursday February 11, 2016 @04:40AM (#11079188)
Not in Firefox, and the GP said they're only keeping Chrome around for Flash.