Re:The crash of 2016?
by bcg1 on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @07:22PM
(#11077340)
If gold isn't money, then why do central banks have so much of it in their vaults?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The crash of 2016?
by scrupulusalbion on Thursday February 11, 2016 @04:19PM
(#11083352)
Strictly speaking, money (as opposed to currency) is whatever is the most commonly used currency in a given region. Gold is not generally used as a medium of exchange anymore (i.e. it is not a currency), so it is merely a valuable commodity.
Re:The crash of 2016?
by ThrustVectoring on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @08:03PM
(#11077527)
They reasonably expect to be able to trade it for money, should they need to.
Why don't they have stocks, diamonds, or any other types of valuables in their vaults?
Re:The crash of 2016?
by ThrustVectoring on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @11:29PM
(#11078239)
Uh, what? They do. The Chinese government owns approximately $60 billion worth of gold, and $1.2 trillion worth of US treasury bonds.
Let me rephrase... why don't they have anything other than gold or cash equivalents?
Re:The crash of 2016?
by ThrustVectoring on Thursday February 11, 2016 @01:32PM
(#11081959)
They're very much risk-adverse (for good reason). In exceptional circumstances, they will take on other assets, though. See - the US Treasury's stake in General Motors.