News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by dheera on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @06:34PM (#11077096)
Data URLs for large images are horribly space-inefficient.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by ghayes on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @06:39PM (#11077128)
Data URLs should be ~1.37x the size [0] of the original file (and generally, kept in the same format). Obviously, there are issues of caching, keeping the image loaded in memory, etc, but it shouldn't be all that bad. Esp. when you consider that ads are inefficient for a variety of other reasons.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64#MIME

Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by dheera on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @08:04PM (#11077534)
Right, I miscalculated, Base64 isn't as bad as I thought.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by kevincox on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @06:38PM (#11077123)
Once you gzip them they aren't bad.
Re:Google is banning Flash from its display ads by kbenson on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @07:45PM (#11077449)
We've been down the rabbit hole for a while now, and we've decided it's not so bad down here. Now we are browsing for curtains and a good rug to make the place feel more like home.