News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diff So Fancy: make Git diffs look good by izolate on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @02:09PM (#11067824)
Remove contextual +/- in favour of colour highlights? As a person with red-green colourblindness all I can say is: Lol. Nope.
Re:Diff So Fancy: make Git diffs look good by scrollaway on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @02:27PM (#11067991)
You know you can customize the diff colors, yes?

From the git book itself: `git config --global color.diff.meta "blue black bold"`

Re:Diff So Fancy: make Git diffs look good by brokentone on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @02:31PM (#11068029)
That's a helpful perspective, but hopefully you already have workarounds on the color issue. This is simply making diff pieces easier to copy / pasta -- which I for one have needed to do. Change my mind on a refactor midstream, need to restore part of the file, etc.
Re:Diff So Fancy: make Git diffs look good by tomjakubowski on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @05:22PM (#11069289)
You might investigate the tools your editor of choice provides for working with diffs. You might be surprised at how easy it can be!

(In Emacs, if you're using git, magit is an amazing package. You can select a commit from the logs, dive into the diff for a file caused by that commit, highlight a region of the diff and revert the change in your working copy. It's wonderful.)

Re:Diff So Fancy: make Git diffs look good by joeheyming on Wednesday February 10, 2016 @12:10AM (#11070872)
Came here for someone to shout-out magit. It's amazing