Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment

Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment by anentropic on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @12:03PM (#11066758)

are you asking why RabbitMQ exists?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment by LaurensBER on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @12:29PM (#11066996)

Yeah, or any documentation that explains the fundamental differences. I get that it's required and I can see the advantages for large scale operations but I never understood why you can run a simpel DB backend for small scale setup.

Just trying to learn here!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Funding Django is not an act of charity, it's an investment by fleetfox on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @12:49PM (#11067140)

You can use relation database but sane implementation is ugly and doesn't scale. There is little reason to choose bunch complexity and unpredictable behavior over dedicated queue dependency. Sorry, i don't have any good material on the topic. Maybe you can use this to see how RDBMS implementation looks and what are the consequences. https://brandur.org/postgres-queues

[ Parent | on HN ]