India bans discriminatory pricing based on source/destination/app/content

Re:India bans discriminatory pricing based on source/destina... by splintercell on Monday February 08, 2016 @04:42PM (#11061090)

> Sets up a monopoly, vendor-lock-in, changes habits: Facebook would hold immeasurable power, once they've got people hooked onto thinking that there's nothing beyond their apps. <

I wanna deal with this monopoly argument I keep hearing everywhere in this thread.

Can there be a monopoly of a web service? Facebook dethrowned MySpace, did myspace have a monopoly? MySpace dethrowned Friendster.

If Google has a monopoly in Search and email then what use is it when it can't push Google Plus? Even with Youtube integration FORCED upon people, nobody used Google plus.

Pretty much every single product other than social networks which Facebook has launched, has been a failure. It couldn't replace Gmail, Snapchat, Instagram.

Microsoft couldn't compete with iPod, Apple couldn't compete on Maps.

It just doesn't matter how much is your market share in a certain existing technology, people judge things based on the products (considering there is no 'price' to lure people away with).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:India bans discriminatory pricing based on source/destina... by ignoramous on Monday February 08, 2016 @10:52PM (#11062945)

You answered your own question, sir. Democratalized Internet is one way those behemoths are taken down.

At Google they say that the compitetor is just a click away. With the "FreeNarcotics" version of the iternet, that may not be true anymore, and a true one omni-monopoly may emerge.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:India bans discriminatory pricing based on source/destina... by ecobiker on Monday February 08, 2016 @06:15PM (#11061699)

But, if you look people out there is no way they'd even know if something is better...

[ Parent | on HN ]