News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A battle over solar power in Nevada by secabeen on Monday February 08, 2016 @12:30PM (#11059461)
The history of net metering comes out of the fact that for many years, smart meters for electricity were very expensive, and not widely deployed. As such, net metering was a natural solution to the billing problem. A user who over-produced for their needs would just run the meter backwards during sunny days, and forwards at night, creating a net metering situation.

It's only with Smart Meters that the utilities can accurately measure per-house production and consumption separately. It's certainly possible to create new billing plans that take advantage of the Smart Meters, but with the capital nature of solar investments, there's a lot of legacy installs to deal with, and those people get angry when they deal they signed up for is changed without grandfathering them into the old way.

Re:A battle over solar power in Nevada by rhino369 on Monday February 08, 2016 @02:26PM (#11060304)
Net metering has always been a subsidy for distributed solar. That's what it's intended as.

If you just wanted to account for peak pricing, you could just create a wholesale solar price that estimated average wholesale price for solar in a given area. You could get pretty damn close without having install smart meters.

Re:A battle over solar power in Nevada by ju-st on Monday February 08, 2016 @01:27PM (#11059912)
No, you can just connect two dumb meters. One counts the energy consumption and the other the production.