News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IETF dress code by dschobel on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:13PM (#1105655)
IETF are an odd bunch. I went to a meeting a few years back and was warned that there might be a humming for consensus.

What is humming for consensus you ask? Well, rather than a show of hands, when deciding on measures and proposals they simply ask the room to hum in favor of a measure.

The reason is simply that even if you are sitting next to your boss it will still be possible for you to vote according to your conscience as it's virtually impossible to distinguish the direction of humming in a room of a hundred or so people. It is, however, easy to tell if a measure has the majority support of a group via humming.

It's very geeky and very smart. Very IETF.

Re:IETF dress code by zandorg on Saturday February 06, 2010 @10:10AM (#1106253)
But someone could have a huge flat speaker to make a humming noise and influence the vote!
Re:IETF dress code by dschobel on Saturday February 06, 2010 @01:09PM (#1106438)
Well since there's no roll call or concept of membership at ietf a more real problem is companies flooding the room with their employees for critical votes.
Re:IETF dress code by 10ren on Sunday February 07, 2010 @04:25AM (#1107491)
Cute implementation of a "silent" ballot, but loud hummers get a disproportionate vote.
Re:IETF dress code by aaronsw on Friday February 05, 2010 @11:11PM (#1105726)
For those wondering, "There are those in the IETF who refuse to wear anything other than suits. Fortunately, they are well known (for other reasons) so they are forgiven this particular idiosyncrasy." is a reference to Vint Cerf. Though I did see Vint in a tracksuit once...
Re:IETF dress code by robk on Saturday February 06, 2010 @12:21PM (#1106382)
I hope it was a three-piece tracksuit, at least. Does Juicy Couture make vests??
Re:IETF dress code by spolsky on Friday February 05, 2010 @09:57PM (#1105637)
I love the way the IETF is still issuing reports formatted for ancient mainframe line printers, with hard-coded headers and footers and whatnot.
Re:IETF dress code by rbanffy on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:06PM (#1105647)
Think of it as future-proofing their documents.

Paper has two advantages: it keeps carbon from becoming a greenhouse gas and quite probably outlasts all our other backup mediums.

Re:IETF dress code by dmoney on Saturday February 06, 2010 @12:41AM (#1105847)
Except clay tablets and this: http://rosettaproject.org/disk/concept/
Re:IETF dress code by gurtwo on Saturday February 06, 2010 @08:46AM (#1106205)
Ugh! Nasty crash on their website; http://staging.rosettaproject.org/blog/02008/nov/3/macro-mic...

"You're seeing this error because you have DEBUG = True in your Django settings file. Change that to False, and Django will display a standard 500 page."

Re:IETF dress code by joshwa on Saturday February 06, 2010 @11:40AM (#1106344)
seems they linked to their staging site (publicly accessible!!) by accident. Same page without staging subdomain:

http://www.rosettaproject.org/blog/02008/nov/3/macro-micro-e...

Re:IETF dress code by blogimus on Saturday February 06, 2010 @02:14AM (#1105951)
And unlike clay tablets, the rosetta disk even has some ISO compliance.
Re:IETF dress code by dmoney on Monday February 08, 2010 @08:00PM (#1111199)
Which ISO is that?
Re:IETF dress code by jacquesm on Saturday February 06, 2010 @05:04AM (#1106084)
The RFCS are all in this format, and since this provides some continuity across the whole set, I'm all for continuing in this way.

Think about what would happen if they made them all spiffy pdfs and then some guy 20 years from now would try to read them.

ASCII is forever, and having a page header on every page is relatively cheap, and helps to keep the context of which document you're looking at clear, the header is never more than 1/2 a page away.

It's quite hard to make a scrolling window with a steady header on a piece of paper ;)

Re:IETF dress code by malkia on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:57PM (#1105704)
I preffer it that way. I can easily copy + paste it, put in a comment in the source code. It's way easier to exchange.
Re:IETF dress code by _delirium on Friday February 05, 2010 @11:18PM (#1105733)
I like the ASCII text aspect for that reason, but does it really need the hard-coded headers and footers every 50 lines?
Re:IETF dress code by robryan on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:11PM (#1105651)
Given professional workplace without a dress code/ uniform it is interesting to see the large variation in what people decide to wear. From shit pants and nice shoes down to t-shirt shorts and runners.
Re:IETF dress code by vkdelta on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:27PM (#1105671)
Never saw this before. Thanks for sharing.
Re:IETF dress code by rbanffy on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:59PM (#1105707)
Thank George (really nice guy who tweets mostly in Portuguese): http://twitter.com/georgeguimaraes/statuses/8705110867

I never imagined IETF issued memos with dress code...

Re:IETF dress code by Joe_Bananas on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:42PM (#1105690)
fucking fascists!
Re:IETF dress code by pyre on Saturday February 06, 2010 @02:48AM (#1105983)
You're right! Fornicating with Nazis is not allowed!
Re:IETF dress code by vkdelta on Friday February 05, 2010 @10:48PM (#1105697)
What makes think they are?
Re:IETF dress code by Joe_Bananas on Sunday February 07, 2010 @09:13AM (#1107693)
Obviously, you're not a golfer.