GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart

Re:GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and e... by sanctus on Saturday February 06, 2016 @09:27PM (#11051241)

> except that because of the original remote nature of Github the first thing you saw was their work and then the person.

Unless their name is in their username. Or they have a profile picture of themselves. Or they have their real name on their commits. Or their username or picture is something stereotypically masculine/feminine.

I searched for 'things' on Github and looked at the most recent committer of the first 20 responses (easiest way I could think of to get a random sample of users). For 16 of them, I could easily see that they were male. 2 of them had their names, but I wasn't sure if the names were feminine or masculine. 2 had no hints whatsoever.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and e... by err4nt on Sunday February 07, 2016 @09:00PM (#11056016)

Because everything name people use online must match their govt issued ID.

I can still remember the first time I uploaded a masculine avatar I had to get a medical exam to prove I was the same gender people seeing my picture assume I am.

Its a hard world, if only we could communicate online with a total identity of our choosing! We could all pick fake names, like a pen name, or a 'pseudo' name thay wasn't real. Wjat a crazy world THAT would be @sanctus.

For bonus points, consider the gender and racial connotations entrenched within your own username - sanctus - based on the language (latin) I'm guessing you're a white roman from antiquity!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and e... by sanctus on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @11:38PM (#11070796)

So what you're saying is that if a woman wants to avoid unconscious bias, she should avoid indicating her gender or pretend to be masculine?

[ Parent | on HN ]