News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Are Stethoscopes Still a Thing? by skywhopper on Saturday February 06, 2016 @08:34AM (#11047697)
The amount a doctor can learn about the functioning of one's heart and lungs via a cheap and simple tool like a stethoscope is amazing, and certainly nothing to look down on. Ultrasound tools may well one day be as commonly used but while ultrasound and other imaging tech can provide images and details stethoscopes cannot, they in turn cannot give the doctor any information about how ones breathing sounds, and cannot provide the instant and visceral connection of hearing your heartbeat directly.

Simple tools like stethoscopes are critical to medical care precisely because they are so cheap, easy to use, flexible, reliable, portable, quick to deploy, and give a direct human connection between doctor and patient. Why would you ever want to replace it? Supplement, sure. Improve, absolutely.

Re:Why Are Stethoscopes Still a Thing? by dbbolton on Saturday February 06, 2016 @09:22AM (#11047819)
Medical student here- I completely agree. Auscultation is an important component of physical examination, and most of this article's arguments against it just seem silly. Ignoring the obvious etymological fallacy, it's just not cost effective to replace stethoscopes with imaging tools.

A "cheap" portable ultrasound machine is going to be in the thousands of dollars, and there's just no way that hospitals and clinics would be able to purchase enough of them so that one was available for every ongoing PE- not to mention the fact that US is billed separately, and could easily double the patient's cost for a brief office visit.

Plain film x-rays and CT scans expose the patient to ionizing radiation, so that's not a practical option either.

MRI is expensive, time-consuming, and a lot of rural hospitals might not have a machine, or if they do, it's very, very unlikely that they're going to have staff available to operate it 24 hours a day.

All of these tools, including the stethoscope, have their own separate uses and applications- they are not competitors.

Re:Why Are Stethoscopes Still a Thing? by douche on Saturday February 06, 2016 @10:12AM (#11048022)
MRIs also have issues if you happen to have ferrous metals in your body. Ignoring obvious things like surgical pins, plates and screws used in orthopedics, and piercings, people in certain occupations have a high likelihood of picking up things like metal filings in their eyes, which can be catastrophic for them in a MRI.
Re:Why Are Stethoscopes Still a Thing? by rrss1122 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @02:48PM (#11049422)
It's simply that old non sequitur: it's 2016 and you shouldn't do X anymore. That's really their main argument. Stop using a 200 year old technology, even if it still works fine.
Re:Why Are Stethoscopes Still a Thing? by kyriakos on Saturday February 06, 2016 @11:06PM (#11051546)
Not to mention, it doesn't need a battery or power to work, meaning it can function under any conditions.