Widest Roman Prime

Re:Widest Roman Prime by lziest on Friday February 05, 2016 @11:42PM (#11046582)

I thought 3888 will be wider than 3889 because VIII certainly feels wider than IX but I am not font expert so I don't know

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Widest Roman Prime by khedoros on Friday February 05, 2016 @11:49PM (#11046592)

But it wouldn't be a prime.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Widest Roman Prime by lziest on Saturday February 06, 2016 @01:28AM (#11046800)

ah missed that. Thanks!

[ Parent | on HN ]