Re:IndieBio SF’s Second Cohort of Biotech Startups
by cing on Friday February 05, 2016 @09:27AM
(#11041575)
How do you feel about the first IndieBio cohort? http://sf.indiebio.co/indiebio-sf-announces-first-class-11-b...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:IndieBio SF’s Second Cohort of Biotech Startups
by dnautics on Friday February 05, 2016 @02:12PM
(#11043821)
Mostly crap, but I like pembient and maybe Clara foods, they have shots at making it. I really want an abiobot but I don't think their founder will make it. Same with arc reactor. Blue turtle was the fraudster of the group. I know enough about Gaucher disease to know that their proposal was total nonsense.
I'm not harshing on class 1 - probably even with ycombinator, many classes if not all are "mostly crap". Zero, though, is stunning.
Re:IndieBio SF’s Second Cohort of Biotech Startups
by mjwaz on Monday February 08, 2016 @03:52PM
(#11060808)
I think pembient are going to contribute to increasing poaching, not preventing it.
Re:IndieBio SF’s Second Cohort of Biotech Startups
by matthewmarkus on Tuesday February 09, 2016 @12:01PM
(#11066726)
Google Alerts has brought this conversation to my attention. If you haven't read our recent thoughts on the issue, I invite you to do so. You can find them here:
https://sosv.com/why-pembient-is-confident-in-synthetic-rhin...
As for IndieBio and the prospects of its class members, I'm sure it is too early to tell. We're flattered, though, to be included in this discussion.