Re:Ask HN: Should TechCrunch Reveal Who Paid For Posts?
by larsr on Friday February 05, 2010 @11:28AM
(#1103896)
Consumer Reports has no advertising and they buy everything they review. When possible, they test items in blind trials. The magazine is also published by a non-profit. On the other hand, Amazon reviews have been gamed by both consumers and companies (two examples: Spore, Belkin). You can't be sure the people writing reviews actually bought the products they are reviewing. In my eyes Amazon reviews are better than nothing, but they don't come close to the value of a review by an unbiased party like Consumer Reports.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Should TechCrunch Reveal Who Paid For Posts?
by pplante on Friday February 05, 2010 @11:44AM
(#1103948)
You have a good point regarding CR.
Re:Ask HN: Should TechCrunch Reveal Who Paid For Posts?
by MotorMouths on Friday February 05, 2010 @03:04PM
(#1104648)
Over the past year we've tracked more than 30,000 published car reviews, including reviews by Consumer Reports as well as 100 other major publications. There is absolutely a correlation between review scores given to vehicles by publications that accept advertising and junkets, and those that do not. Make of that what you will.