News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple’s declining software quality. Parent comment

Re:Apple’s declining software quality by baudehlo on Thursday February 04, 2016 @07:32PM (#11038458)
Actually NT 3.51, which I used for dev and was great compared to my colleagues on plain windows.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple’s declining software quality by TazeTSchnitzel on Thursday February 04, 2016 @08:00PM (#11038620)
Actually NT 3.1. 3.5 followed, then 3.51, then 4.0, then 5.0 (2000), and then the NT line ended as it was unified with the non-NT line.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple’s declining software quality by vl on Friday February 05, 2016 @01:24AM (#11039903)
Technically 9x line ended since Windows XP was NT-based and not 9x-based.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple’s declining software quality by TazeTSchnitzel on Friday February 05, 2016 @05:21AM (#11040582)
Yes, I suppose so. I didn't want to say the 9x line ended, because it's really the line of DOS-based OSes, and while the NT line is ongoing, it's no longer called NT. 2000 was the last version to mention NT, and it wasn't part of the name itself, just a tagline.
[ Parent | on HN ]